Featured
Table of Contents
A debtor further might submit its petition in any location where it is domiciled (i.e. incorporated), where its principal location of business in the United States is located, where its principal possessions in the US are located, or in any place where any of its affiliates can submit. See 28 U.S.C.Proposed changes to the venue requirements in the US Bankruptcy Code could threaten the US Bankruptcy Courts' command of international restructuringsModifications and do place at a time united states many of the US' united states competitive advantages are diminishing.
Both propose to get rid of the ability to "forum shop" by omitting a debtor's location of incorporation from the location analysis, andalarming to international debtorsexcluding money or money equivalents from the "principal possessions" equation. Furthermore, any equity interest in an affiliate will be considered located in the exact same location as the principal.
Normally, this testimony has been focused on controversial 3rd celebration release arrangements executed in recent mass tort cases such as Purdue Pharma, Boy Scouts of America, and many Catholic diocese bankruptcies. These arrangements frequently force financial institutions to launch non-debtor 3rd parties as part of the debtor's strategy of reorganization, despite the fact that such releases are probably not allowed, at least in some circuits, by the Insolvency Code.
In effort to mark out this habits, the proposed legislation claims to restrict "forum shopping" by restricting entities from filing in any venue other than where their home office or principal physical assetsexcluding money and equity interestsare situated. Seemingly, these expenses would promote the filing of Chapter 11 cases in other United States districts, and steer cases away from the favored courts in New York, Delaware and Texas.
Despite their laudable function, these proposed amendments might have unforeseen and potentially adverse repercussions when viewed from a worldwide restructuring potential. While congressional testament and other commentators assume that venue reform would simply guarantee that domestic companies would submit in a various jurisdiction within the United States, it is an unique possibility that international debtors might pass on the United States Bankruptcy Courts altogether.
Without the factor to consider of cash accounts as an opportunity toward eligibility, numerous foreign corporations without tangible properties in the US may not qualify to file a Chapter 11 bankruptcy in any United States jurisdiction. Second, even if they do certify, global debtors might not be able to count on access to the typical and convenient reorganization friendly jurisdictions.
Provided the complicated concerns regularly at play in a worldwide restructuring case, this might cause the debtor and creditors some unpredictability. This uncertainty, in turn, might motivate global debtors to file in their own nations, or in other more beneficial nations, rather. Significantly, this proposed venue reform comes at a time when lots of nations are imitating the United States and revamping their own restructuring laws.
In a departure from their previous restructuring system which highlighted liquidation, the new Code's objective is to restructure and protect the entity as a going issue. Therefore, financial obligation restructuring contracts may be authorized with as low as 30 percent approval from the overall debt. Nevertheless, unlike the US, Italy's new Code will not feature an automated stay of enforcement actions by lenders.
In February of 2021, a Canadian court extended the nation's approval of 3rd party release provisions. In Canada, organizations typically rearrange under the conventional insolvency statutes of the Business' Creditors Plan Act (). 3rd party releases under the CCAAwhile hotly objected to in the USare a common element of restructuring plans.
The current court decision makes clear, though, that regardless of the CBCA's more restricted nature, 3rd party release arrangements might still be acceptable. Companies may still obtain themselves of a less cumbersome restructuring offered under the CBCA, while still getting the advantages of third celebration releases. Efficient since January 1, 2021, the Dutch Act Upon Court Verification of Extrajudicial Restructuring Plans has actually produced a debtor-in-possession procedure performed beyond official bankruptcy procedures.
Reliable as of January 1, 2021, Germany's brand-new Act on the Stabilization and Restructuring Framework for Organizations offers pre-insolvency restructuring proceedings. Prior to its enactment, German business had no alternative to reorganize their financial obligations through the courts. Now, distressed business can call upon German courts to restructure their financial obligations and otherwise maintain the going concern value of their organization by using many of the very same tools offered in the United States, such as keeping control of their company, enforcing stuff down restructuring plans, and carrying out collection moratoriums.
Inspired by Chapter 11 of the US Personal Bankruptcy Code, this brand-new structure streamlines the debtor-in-possession restructuring process largely in effort to assist small and medium sized organizations. While previous law was long slammed as too expensive and too complicated since of its "one size fits all" method, this brand-new legislation incorporates the debtor in ownership design, and offers for a structured liquidation process when necessary In June 2020, the UK enacted the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act of 2020 ().
Notably, CIGA provides for a collection moratorium, revokes specific arrangements of pre-insolvency agreements, and enables entities to propose an arrangement with investors and creditors, all of which permits the formation of a cram-down plan comparable to what might be achieved under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code. In 2017, Singapore embraced enacted the Companies (Change) Act 2017 (Singapore), that made major legal modifications to the restructuring provisions of the Singapore Companies Act (Cap 50) 2006.
As a result, the law has substantially improved the restructuring tools available in Singapore courts and moved Singapore as a leading hub for insolvency in the Asia-Pacific. In May of 2016, India enacted the Insolvency and Personal Bankruptcy Code, which entirely upgraded the personal bankruptcy laws in India. This legislation seeks to incentivize additional financial investment in the nation by providing greater certainty and efficiency to the restructuring process.
Provided these current modifications, international debtors now have more alternatives than ever. Even without the proposed restrictions on eligibility, foreign entities may less need to flock to the US as before. Further, need to the US' venue laws be amended to avoid simple filings in specific practical and helpful locations, worldwide debtors may start to think about other locations.
Special thanks to Dallas associate Michael Berthiaume who prepared and authored this material under the guidance of Rebecca Winthrop, Of Counsel in our Los Angeles workplace.
Business filings leapt 49% year-over-year the greatest January level given that 2018. The numbers reflect what debt experts call "slow-burn monetary strain" that's been developing for years.
Consumer insolvency filings totaled 44,282 in January 2026, up 9% from January 2025. Industrial filings hit 1,378 a 49% year-over-year jump and the greatest January business filing level since 2018. For all of 2025, customer filings grew nearly 14%.
Latest Posts
How to Manage Total Debt Safely
How to Handle Personal Insolvency Effectively
Reviewing Top Debt Settlement Options in 2026
